![Profile picture of Philip Strothmann]()
Philip Strothmann posted in the group All Users
Dear all, I realized that unfortunately the weekly digest was sent our twice. I believe I have identified the issue and fixed it now. Apologies for the double email!
![Profile picture of Philip Strothmann]()
Philip Strothmann posted in the group All Users
Dear all, I am happy to let you know that during last week’s General Assembly, Guy Castelan, Melissa Diaz, René Itten and Takunda Chitaka were (re)elected into our Board of Directors where they will join our existing Board members. If you would like to learn more about our Board of Directors, you can check out their profiles here: ht…Read More
![Profile picture of Philip Strothmann]()
Philip Strothmann posted in the group All Users
Dear all, today we would like to invite you to join us on the 8th of December at 3pm for a special open access webinar by none other than our co-founder Jim Fava, who’s going to officially retire at the end of this year after an amazing career promoting life cycle thinking over 45 years around the world! Jim will share some insights from his c…Read More
![Profile picture of Philip Strothmann]()
Philip Strothmann posted in the group All Users
Quick reminder: We have an awesome webinar coming up (16 Nov at 2pm) on “Geopolitical-related supply risk assessment as a new resource indicator to complement environmental impact assessment in Life Cycle Assessment” by Prof. Guido Sonnemann. If you are a member with us, you can sign up for the free webinar and learn more about it here:…Read More
Methodological Challenge! How would you approach the following situation?
A chemical company produces a product using two chemically equivalent feedstocks with different impacts. Let’s call them “F” and “low carbon F”.
Both arrive at the factory and get mixed in a tank. And both are used in the same production line to produce the same product.…Read More2 Comments![Profile picture of Ravi Teja Pabbisetty]()
I completely concur with Lise Laurin’s reply. I encounter this quite often, very recently in the area of SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel) and LCAF (Low Carbon Aviation Fuel) when I was working with PETRONAS. In the aviation fuel industry, this concept of separation is called “Book and Claim” (Ref:
Book and Claim – RSBhttps://rsb.org › book-claim)
- Load More Posts
Recently Active Users
Great question, Pia! If the company treats “low carbon F” like a power purchase agreement, in other words, any extra cost for the low carbon product are accounted to the low carbon P, this could be an acceptable assessment. However, the company must do clear accounting so that they don’t sell more low carbon P than can be produced using the low…Read More